Back to OpenRounds
PubMedThe Lancet. Digital healthTop Journal

Examining reliance patterns on AI advice in medical imaging: a mixed-methods, randomised, crossover experiment.

Friday, October 23, 2026

Referenced in Daily Briefing

Published in The Lancet. Digital health. Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) holds significant potential to support diagnostic decision making; however, the collaboration between clinicians and AI systems often does not surpass the performance of unaided humans or standalone AI. This study aimed to examine the effect of AI advice on diagnostic decision making among experts and novices, focusing on the occurrence of AI over-reliance and under-reliance and the potential mitigating effect of explainable AI. We used a mixed-methods, randomised, crossover experimental design. Participants (50 task experts [radiologists] and 75 novices [non-radiologist physicians and medical trainees]) were randomly assigned in equal proportions to one of six groups, which determined the order in which the three conditions were presented across the three sessions. In each session, participants read 50 head CT scans with or without the presence of an intracranial haemorrhage, under one of three experimental conditions: control, no AI prediction; basic AI advice, AI prediction without annotations; and explainable AI advice, AI prediction with scan annotations. 80% of cases with basic or explainable AI advice received correct advice, and 20% received incorrect advice. The main outcomes were diagnostic performance (the correct identification of intracranial haemorrhage), confidence in the diagnosis, case reading time, and AI advice usefulness ratings. We defined under-reliance as a final decision that did not align with correct AI advice, and over-r...

5 Key Takeaways

  1. Under-reliance on correct AI advice had a more detrimental effect on diagnostic performance than over-reliance on incorrect advice.
  2. Correct explainable AI advice improved diagnostic performance and confidence, particularly for difficult cases, but did not reduce reading time.
  3. Explainable AI was perceived as more useful than basic AI advice, especially among novice users.

OpenRounds transcript synthesis · Verify against the source

Read Source ↗

OpenRounds Source Analysis

Sign in for an evidence-focused interpretation, plus Saved articles and your personalized feed.

Sign InBack to OpenRounds

Daily healthcare AI brief

Get the free healthcare AI briefing

One concise briefing built from reporting, research, policy, blogs, videos, and full podcast transcripts.

Free. Get a sign-in link by email to finish subscribing. An account is created if needed. Unsubscribe anytime. Already subscribed? Sign in to save and personalize.